Note: foldedspace.org died recently, and is gradually being reconstructed. This entry has moved. The 72 comments from before the move can be found here.
I saw Peter Jackson’s Helms Deep twice on Wednesday. Though I liked the film better the second time, I was still disappointed. Much of that disappointment is a result of baggage that I bring as an audience-member and not a result of Jackson’s filmmaking; nearly every other review I’ve read or heard has been glowing.
I was going to write a proper paragraph-based review with nice transitions, etc. etc. etc. but I’m not up to the effort. Instead I’m going to provide a review which uses lots of bullet points. Warning: spoilers ahead!
Please keep in mind that I do not hate Peter Jackson’s Helms Deep; I’m just disappointed by it. I was also disappointed by The Fellowship of the Ring last year, though I’ve warmed to it after multiple viewings. Most of my review focuses on the negative aspects of Helms Deep, but that’s only because all of the other reviews are glowing and you can read them to find out about all that is good about the film.
Here are some disappointing features shared by The Fellowship of the Ring and Peter Jackson’s Helms Deep:
- Intrusive music
- Howard Shore‘s score isn’t bad, but it’s omnipresent, and sometimes overwhelms the action on the screen. Maybe this is a problem with me as an audience member. Perhaps others like it. I don’t.
- Moving camera
- I was sick last year when I saw The Fellowship of the Ring. The always-moving camera made me feel even more nauseated. Peter Jackson (and his unit directors) don’t seem to have enough confidence in their framing to allow a simple static shot. The camera pans and sweeps and soars and zooms and never stays in one place for long. It’s dizzying.
- Elves
- Yes, elves are wispy and mystic. But these films play them in such a languorous fashion that they nearly put me to sleep whenever they appear. The elves speak s-l-o-w-l-y. They move s-l-o-w-l-y. It gives the intended other-worldly effect, but it also slows the pacing. Rivendell and Lothlorien are the two slow points in Fellowship. The Arwen/Elronod/Galadriel section slows Helms Deep. I’m not suggesting that these scenes should not be in the films, just that they should have been done differently.
- Glossing
- Because The Lord of the Rings is a huge story, it’s impossible for Peter Jackson to put everything on the screen. It’s inevitable that some things have to be cut. Tom Bombadil? Yes, I love him, too, but he’s not essential to the story. However, I don’t understand why essential bits were cut (or glossed over): Galadriel’s gifts in Fellowship (which, fortunately, are restored in the extended DVD), Merry and Pippin’s experiences with the orcs, the Ents, etc. Merry and Pippin are give rather short shrift in Helms Deep, which is unfortunate.
- Battles
- My least favorite parts of these films are the battle sequences. The book has battle sequences, and they are integral to the story. I am not opposed to battle sequences, even long ones, if they are done well. The battle scenes in these films are not done well. They’re long and nonsensical. Jackson spends a lot of time establishing that the orcs, especially the Uruk-Hai, are threatening, yet when they enter combat, they’re surprisingly ineffective. They’re like Star Wars stormtroopers with swords instead of blasters. In Ewoks Attack, pint-sized teddy bears are able to take out trained battle troops with rocks. In both Fellowship of the Ring and Helms Deep, Merry and Pippin take about trained battle troops with rocks. We’re supposed to find these villains threatening?
Here are my specific comments regarding Peter Jackson’s Helms Deep:
Negatives
Positives:
- It was clever to merge Gandalf’s voice with Saruman’s when Gandalf the White first appears. I like that.
- The acting is uniformly excellent, especially that from the supporting players. Grima, Theoden and Eowyn are fantastic, almost Shakespearean. This is the element of the books and the films that I love: the literate epic drama, not the fantastic battle scenes. Pare down the battle scenes and give me more intrigue with Theoden and Grima and Saruman! Give me more acting, less fighting. This would make a better film. (For me.)
- Generally, I’m not a fan of horses; they’re big clumsy beasts that step on young boys and scar them for life (literally and figuratively). However, I think horsemanship is a skill that transfers well to film and I want more. The little that is on screen is great, but give me more more more!
- Wormtongue rocks. Well done!
- Arwen has fantastic lips. Very kissable. They’re the best part of the film, really.
- Gollum has no dangly bits where his dangly bits should be.
- Jeremy says: “Those rocks actually fall like rocks instead of Styrofoam blocks.” (This is true of the bigger pieces, but the smaller “stones” in close-ups still fall like Styrofoam blocks.)
- Treebeard: “That doesn’t make any sense to me. But, then, you are very small.”
- Gollum’s internal conflict plays well on the screen. It’s written and performed well.
- The song that plays over the end credits is by one of my favorite obscure artists, Emiliana Torrini. It’s great!
I like nearly every portion of Peter Jackson’s Helms Deep in isolation. If you were to show me any one scene, I’d like it. However, when the scenes are strung together into a film, something seems to be missing. The whole is less than the sum of its parts.
Remember: I do not hate this film. It’s above average in fact, meriting a 6.0 on J.D.’s Patented Move Rating Scale. I had hoped for more.
One of my favorite bits from Tolkien:
Frodo
If you ask it of me, I will give you the One Ring.
Galadriel
You offer it to me freely? I do not deny that my heart has greatly desired this.
In place of a Dark Lord you would have a queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the dawn! Treacherous as the sea! Stronger than the foundations of the earth! All shall love me and despair!
I pass the test. I will diminish and go into the west and remain Galadriel.
On 20 December 2002 (10:47 AM),
Dana said:
On 20 December 2002 (03:25 PM),
Dave said:
On 23 December 2002 (04:53 PM),
Tracie said:
On 27 December 2002 (11:05 AM),
ME said:
On 30 December 2002 (08:47 PM),
Rory said:
On 30 December 2002 (10:47 PM),
Gordon said:
On 30 January 2003 (11:49 AM),
Turbonut2003 said:
On 04 February 2003 (09:24 PM),
Bob said:
On 05 February 2003 (01:43 AM),
M@TT said:
On 08 February 2003 (05:47 PM),
Bob said:
On 08 February 2003 (10:41 PM),
J.D. said:
On 15 February 2003 (12:55 PM),
kingbridge said:
On 14 March 2003 (06:14 PM),
heather said:
On 18 March 2003 (05:47 AM),
Susie said:
On 30 July 2003 (04:00 PM),
shooka said:
On 03 August 2003 (11:01 PM),
frodofanatic said:
On 04 August 2003 (07:12 PM),
dowingba said:
On 07 August 2003 (06:49 PM),
Eric said:
On 05 September 2003 (12:02 PM),
Ben Mead said:
On 13 September 2003 (03:06 PM),
Imrahil said:
On 26 September 2003 (05:14 PM),
jess said:
On 26 September 2003 (08:56 PM),
dowingba said:
On 29 September 2003 (06:54 PM),
LegolasFan said:
On 24 October 2003 (09:25 AM),
Kyadoshi said:
On 25 October 2003 (09:33 AM),
Sandor jun. Simon said:
On 12 November 2003 (03:24 PM),
championangel121 said:
On 16 November 2003 (02:46 PM),
Billy said:
On 01 December 2003 (12:53 AM),
JJ said:
On 01 December 2003 (02:30 PM),
Ruthie;-) said:
On 01 December 2003 (06:19 PM),
Kevin Cheberenchick said:
On 01 December 2003 (06:19 PM),
Kevin Cheberenchick said:
On 01 December 2003 (06:22 PM),
Kevin Cheberenchick said:
On 11 December 2003 (02:52 PM),
Adrimal Ardvark on board the Bolivian Navy Ships (currently on manuvers in the South Pacific) said:
On 16 December 2003 (07:03 PM),
Rachel Nipper said:
On 16 December 2003 (09:25 PM),
Courtney said:
On 22 December 2003 (09:35 AM),
Shane said:
On 27 December 2003 (09:24 AM),
Michael Hamill said:
On 05 January 2004 (05:17 PM),
Emily said:
On 05 January 2004 (05:17 PM),
Emily said:
On 18 January 2004 (02:42 PM),
Tulkas said:
On 28 January 2004 (04:45 PM),
I LOVE ELIJAH WOOD!! said:
On 07 February 2004 (01:20 PM),
Emily W. said:
On 11 February 2004 (07:49 PM),
Sammy said:
On 12 February 2004 (06:43 PM),
Jacob D. said:
On 13 February 2004 (12:52 PM),
Jacob said:
On 14 February 2004 (09:37 AM),
Emily W. said:
On 14 February 2004 (10:01 AM),
Emily W. said:
On 19 February 2004 (03:44 PM),
Vaessa said:
On 24 February 2004 (02:10 PM),
Emily W. said:
On 28 February 2004 (01:41 PM),
Emily W. said:
On 01 March 2004 (05:51 AM),
TolkFanatic said:
On 05 March 2004 (02:30 PM),
Emily W. said:
On 17 March 2004 (08:00 PM),
Krishan Bhakta said:
On 18 March 2004 (04:46 PM),
gemma said:
On 18 March 2004 (04:57 PM),
gemma ward said:
On 09 May 2004 (01:15 PM),
Emily w said:
On 09 May 2004 (01:19 PM),
Emily w said:
On 29 November 2004 (08:43 AM),
Jessica said:
On 14 December 2004 (12:31 PM),
someone said:
On 14 December 2004 (03:08 PM),
Joel said:
On 27 December 2004 (02:56 PM),
Ezri Bloom said:
On 13 January 2005 (01:51 PM),
Emily W. said:
On 16 March 2005 (05:19 PM),
marcia said:
On 02 April 2005 (08:52 AM),
Ruben said:
On 23 April 2005 (10:39 AM),
Murray MacDonald said:
On 23 April 2005 (10:39 AM),
Murray MacDonald said:
On 23 April 2005 (10:39 AM),
Murray MacDonald said:
On 13 July 2005 (11:43 AM),
whodyanikabolokov said:
On 14 July 2005 (10:06 AM),
Will said:
On 27 August 2005 (03:24 PM),
Cassandra said:
On 08 September 2005 (08:11 AM),
RAGHAVAN said:
On 08 October 2005 (06:30 PM),
Hillary said:
You and I frequently like or dislike the same things, but for vastly different reasons. In a surprising turn of events, I pretty much agree with your reasoning completely.
The presence or absence of Gollum’s dangly bits aside, he’s an amazing piece of work, and everybody involved with him deserves recognition. He’s pretty amazing.
I know that there is destined to be no Scouring of the Shire, too, in the third film, and I think this will rob the conclusion of a needed closure.
The Saruman/Gandalf blend was indeed quite neat, but I thought it would have worked much better if the previews hadn’t given away that Gandalf returns…
“Your talk of snuffling riders with invisible noses has unsettled me.” — Pippin, FotR